For the last few months, democratic strategists have mocked the self destructive Republican focus on ideological purity, citing the party switch of Arlen Specter and the electoral defeat of Dede Scozzafava as prime examples that this type of party building does not work. The GOP has been so focused on ideological purity of late that the ultra-conservative Club for Growth exists simply to run primary candidates against moderates even at the cost of the general election. Many have attributed this strategy of ideological purity to the catastrophic GOP losses in the last two election cycles.
So this brings us to my question; is it hypocritical of the democrats to conspire against Blanche Lincoln? I am not inclined to think it is for several reasons. First, Blanche Lincoln's favorability ratings in Arkansas have hovered around 20% for over a year now. No incumbent this unpopular has ever been reelected. Bill Halter would arguably improve the democrats' position in this race, rather than detract from it. Second, Blanche Lincoln is a complete sellout. It is one thing to be a moderate politician and vote with your conscience. It is another all together to change your stances on key issues after receiving campaign contributions from Aetna. This is why you'll never hear about anybody trying to primary Ben Nelson (D-NE). He is a conservative, so he votes conservatively. No contradiction there.
No comments:
Post a Comment